There is no better film adaptation and no better Mr. Rochester, in my opinion, than the 1997 Samantha Morton, Ciaran Hinds TV version of Jane Eyre. But then I’m rather partial to Hinds. He does a wonderful Captain Wentworth in Persuasion (1995). Sigh. And as Mr. Rochester, he is delightfully surly, filled with pathos and burning desire for Jane. Double sigh.
As the second novel in my Victorian Literature course I had the pleasure of re-reading Charlotte Bronte’s Jane Eyre, though I write this somewhat tongue-in-cheek, for although I love the Hinds movie version, and I love the parts of the book, much of it has always wondered off into too much Christian mumble jumble for me to truly love it. It was with much hope then that with a close re-reading of the novel I would find a new appreciation for the book. I did and I didn’t.
I still found moments in the book far too preachy for my tastes. Little orphan Helen Burns is just too filled with goody two-shoeness at the beginning of the novel, and St. Johns Rivers is too much the religious zealot, and all the Christian hyperbole and rhetoric just makes me yawn and roll my eyes. But despite all this, there is something in the romance of Jane and Mr. Rochester that brings me back for more, time and time again.
For those of you who don’t know the tale (and honestly, have you been living under a rock?!), we are introduced to our intrepid heroine, Jane Eyre, at the age of ten, living penniless and parentless on the spurious charity of her uncle’s widow, Mrs. Reed, who turns out to be no fit mother to little orphan Jane. The moment Mrs. Reed can farm out poor Jane to Lowood Institution, she does and there Jane spends the next eight years (six as a pupil, two as teacher). Lowood, by the way, is one horrible, nasty place where the food, what little there is, is burnt more often than not, and the ill-clothed girls, when not at their studies from morning to night, are tramping miles in the frigid weather to Sunday services. I jest not, though the old joke’s punch line “uphill both ways” resounds in my head.
At Lowood Jane meets fellow orphan Helen Burns who is far too good and angelic for this world and soon dies of consumption. It is also at Lowood where Jane encounters the antithesis of Mrs. Reed in Miss Temple, a much gentler and kinder mother-figure who abandons Jane for marriage to a clergyman less worthy of such an esteemed woman, at least in Jane’s opinion. This abandonment unearths the wandering spirit long suppressed in Jane, and she advertises herself out as a governess. The only reply is from a Mrs. Fairfax at Thornfield Hall.
Ah Thornfield, home of the troubled Mr. Rochester. We soon learn that little Adele, who Jane is hired as a governess for, is the daughter of his former mistress, because Mr. Rochester lived a life of unhappy dissipation for many years. The why of which is eventually revealed in the form of a mad wife locked away in the attic. Of course, Mr. Rochester falls in love with Jane, but their marriage is thwarted by wife #1.
The mad wife and her antics gives us a nice gothic twist to this tale, with bumps in the night, mad laughter echoing from behind closed doors, and so forth. Delicious!
Broken-hearted Jane flees Thornfield and falls upon the mercy and charity of the Rivers family, clergyman St. John and his two sisters Diana and Mary. This is the part of the book that is most boring for me, because I just want to see the lovers united. But the reader’s forbearance is rewarded, as is Jane’s goodness when she receives an unexpected inheritance from a long lost uncle leaving her a woman of independent means, and she returns to Thornfield to find out whatever happened to that guy, Mr. Rochester. Cue the violins and pass the Kleenex, because the lovers are about to discover they are both finally free and socially equal enough as to join hands in holy matrimony and live happily ever after.
Very big, satisfying sigh for all is once again right with the world, which calls for a pot of tea in celebration, so…
Till next time, happy reading!
L J
TBR = 24 | WPL = 28 |